Attachment theory

Also: attachment styles, secure attachment, attachment in polyamory

A framework describing how early bonds shape adult patterns of seeking and responding to closeness — secure, anxious, avoidant, disorganised — increasingly used in ENM to understand why some configurations feel safe and others don't.

1 min read · Reviewed 2026-05-24

Attachment theory describes the patterns people develop for managing closeness and separation: roughly, secure (comfortable with intimacy and autonomy), anxious (preoccupied with a partner's availability), avoidant (uncomfortable with too much closeness), and disorganised (a mix, often trauma-rooted). It originated in developmental psychology and was extended to adult romantic relationships, and it has become one of the most influential lenses in modern non-monogamy.

Its prominence in ENM is largely thanks to Jessica Fern's Polysecure, which applies attachment theory directly to consensual non-monogamy and argues that you can build secure attachment with more than one partner — but that doing so requires deliberate attention to the conditions that create felt security, because non-monogamy can activate attachment fears that monogamy's exclusivity papers over.

Practically, the framework helps explain reactions that otherwise look irrational: why an anxiously-attached person spirals when a partner is on a date, why an avoidant person pulls back as a relationship deepens, why certain agreements soothe and others inflame. It reframes those reactions as attachment needs to be worked with rather than character flaws — and offers a vocabulary partners can use to ask for what actually helps.

Sources & further reading