Ethical non-monogamy
Also: ENM, consensual non-monogamy, CNM
An umbrella term for relationship structures in which everyone involved knows about, and consents to, the participants having more than one romantic or sexual connection.
Ethical non-monogamy (ENM) is the umbrella term that covers every relationship configuration in which the people involved are honest with each other about the existence of multiple romantic or sexual partners. The word ethical here is doing all of the work: it is not a moral grade, it is a description. The distinguishing feature is informed, ongoing consent from everyone affected. A relationship can be ethical and non-monogamous; a relationship can also be unethical and non-monogamous, in which case it is more usually called cheating.
ENM is not a single relationship style. It is a category. Underneath it sit polyamory, open relationships, relationship anarchy, solo polyamory, kitchen-table polyamory, parallel polyamory, monogamish arrangements, polyfidelity, and a long list of other configurations. The category exists because all of these structures share one premise — multiple connections, openly negotiated — even though they differ sharply in how the connections are structured, prioritised, and described.
Two synonyms appear frequently. Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) is the term most often used in academic writing; some researchers prefer it because it foregrounds the consent dimension and avoids the loaded word ethical. The two terms are used interchangeably in practice. Some practitioners use just 'non-monogamy' for short, dropping the qualifier once context is established.
Survey data suggests ENM is more common than the cultural conversation implies. A 2016 study by Haupert and colleagues, drawing on two nationally representative US samples, found that around 21% of single adults had practised some form of consensual non-monogamy at some point in their lives. Subsequent surveys have produced numbers in similar ranges across different populations.
What ENM is not: it is not cheating renamed, it is not a phase universally outgrown, it is not synonymous with promiscuity, and it is not the absence of commitment. Practitioners in long-term polyamorous structures often describe the level of communication required as higher than they experienced in monogamous relationships, not lower.